# GPT-5 Pro vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-pro-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.2 to 35.0.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 58 | 191 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $15 | — |
| Output $/M | $120 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.26 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1246 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5 Pro better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5 Pro or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.