# GPT-5 Pro vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

> GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-pro-vs-llama2-70b-steerlm-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 38.9 to 20.0.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 64 | 268 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $15 | — |
| Output $/M | $120 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1047 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1063 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1060 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1058 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5 Pro better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5 Pro or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.