# GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. GPT-5 Nano costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-nano-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Nano scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Plus in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.4 to 39.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 81.1% for GPT-5 Nano and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.
- GPT-5 Nano is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 234 | 204 |
| Context | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5 Nano: 33.3 (#248)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1328 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 34.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 38.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 718.67 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5 Nano: 25.6 (#99)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 21.8% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 51.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5 Nano: 16.4 (#291)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 62.2% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1329 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 62.7% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 7.9% | 24% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 20.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 27% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.39 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.1 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5 Nano: 29.1 (#221)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 81.1% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1318 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.2% | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 8.3% | 1.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 20% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| ProofBench | 12% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 54.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5 Nano: 35.8 (#166)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 69.4% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1328 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 11.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5 Nano: 30.7 (#102)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1159 | — |
| VPCT | 37.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5 Nano: 45.5 (#167)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1355 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1296 | 1323 |
| LMArena German | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Korean | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1360 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5 Nano: 75.2 (#72)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1306 | 1303 |
| IFEval | 93.2% | — |

## Long Context

- GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#275)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1313 | 1325 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5 Nano: 39.4 (#244)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1320 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1311 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 705 | — |
| WildBench | 80.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5 Nano better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. GPT-5 Nano costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Nano or Qwen Plus?

GPT-5 Nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is GPT-5 Nano or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 400K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Nano and Qwen Plus share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Nano has 48 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.