# GPT-5 Mini vs MiniMax-M2.1

> GPT-5 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-mini-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Mini scores higher in 5 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5 Mini leads 46.7 to 38.3.
- MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $2 for GPT-5 Mini.
- GPT-5 Mini accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 128 | 178 |
| Context | 400K | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $2 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5 Mini: 40.1 (#146)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1406 | 1421 |
| ALE-Bench | 799.77 | 623.83 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 64.7% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 39.7% | — |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.7% | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.38 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5 Mini: 31.1 (#70)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 34.8% | 36.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 55.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -31.18 | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5 Mini: 23.9 (#168)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1380 | 1411 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 54.3% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 8.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 10% | — |
| DTBench | 80.5% | — |
| LMCA | 34.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.52 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5 Mini: 46.7 (#69)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1378 | 1397 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 72.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 97.8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5 Mini: 45.6 (#86)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | 11.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1379 | 1431 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 19.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 83.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 75.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5 Mini: 35.6 (#85)
- MiniMax-M2.1: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1202 | — |
| VPCT | 40.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5 Mini: 48.9 (#137)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1385 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1386 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | 1366 | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1341 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1362 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1355 | 1397 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5 Mini: 76.2 (#46)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1357 | 1400 |
| IFEval | 92.7% | — |

## Long Context

- GPT-5 Mini: 41.9 (#132)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1355 | 1416 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5 Mini: 55.2 (#148)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1373 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1325 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1363 | 1396 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1313 | — |
| WildBench | 85.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5 Mini better than MiniMax-M2.1?

GPT-5 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Mini or MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Mini lists at $0.25 and $2.

### Is GPT-5 Mini or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.1 vs 40.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5 Mini does, with 400K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Mini and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.