# GPT-5-Codex vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

> Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-codex-vs-step-2-16k-exp-202412
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5-Codex leads 30.0 to 24.8.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 190 | 173 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5-Codex: 41.9 (#100)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 54.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1316 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5-Codex: 30.8 (#66)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 44.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5-Codex: 30.0 (#80)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |

## Math

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1279 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1287 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1307 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1292 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5-Codex better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5-Codex or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.