# GPT-5-Codex vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> GPT-5-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-codex-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5-Codex leads 30.9 to 23.6.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 192 | 254 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5-Codex: 42.4 (#103)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 54.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5-Codex: 31.0 (#72)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 44.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5-Codex: 30.9 (#83)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |

## Math

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5-Codex better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

GPT-5-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5-Codex or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.