# GPT-5-Codex vs MiniMax-M2.1

> MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-codex-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5-Codex scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5-Codex leads 30.0 to 15.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Terminal-Bench: 44.3% for GPT-5-Codex and 36.6% for MiniMax-M2.1.
- MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5-Codex.
- GPT-5-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 190 | 177 |
| Context | 400K | 205K |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5-Codex: 41.9 (#100)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| WeirdML | 54.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1421 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5-Codex: 30.8 (#66)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 44.3% | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5-Codex: 30.0 (#80)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1410 |

## Math

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1432 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1430 |
| LMArena French | — | 1405 |
| LMArena German | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1399 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1396 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5-Codex better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5-Codex or MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

### Is GPT-5-Codex or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.