# GPT-5-Codex vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

> Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-codex-vs-hunyuan-turbos
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5-Codex leads 30.9 to 27.8.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 192 | 139 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5-Codex: 42.4 (#103)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 54.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1361 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5-Codex: 31.0 (#72)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 44.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5-Codex: 30.9 (#83)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |

## Math

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1368 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1344 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1387 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5-Codex better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5-Codex or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.