# GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

> GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Max Preview costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-pro-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 41.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 58.6% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 20% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper at $1.30 / $7.80 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 18 | 43 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $30 | $1.30 |
| Output $/M | $180 | $7.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | 63% |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | 20% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 149.24 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 87.2% |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | 4.2% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1465 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | 52% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1487 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1438 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1457 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Max Preview costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper. It lists at $1.30 per million input tokens and $7.80 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 43.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.