# GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3 32B

> GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 32B costs 55× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-pro-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 32B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 71.0 to 19.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 58.6% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 5% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 16 | 166 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $30 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $180 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1358 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 30% | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | 5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | 138.51 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1335 |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1399 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | 5.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1311 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1305 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1327 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen3 32B?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 32B costs 55× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 32B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.