# GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen2.5-Max

> GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-pro-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 25.6.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 40.7 |
| Rank | 18 | 146 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $30 | — |
| Output $/M | $180 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1359 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 132.53 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1360 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1369 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1335 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1364 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen2.5-Max?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen2.5-Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.