# GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 44.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 124× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-pro-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 71.0 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 30% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 4% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 44.8 |
| Rank | 16 | 70 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $30 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $180 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1502 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 30% | 4% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1487 |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1480 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena German | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1477 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1477 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 44.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 124× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.