# GPT-5.4 Pro vs Llama 2-13B

> GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-pro-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 71.0 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 58.6% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 0% for Llama 2-13B.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 16 | 304 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $30 | — |
| Output $/M | $180 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1062 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | 105.8 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1051 |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1065 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6)
- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1001 |
| LMArena French | — | 1043 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1086 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1046 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Llama 2-13B?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Llama 2-13B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.