# GPT-5.4 Pro vs Llama 13b

> GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-pro-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 14.0.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 18 | 348 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $30 | — |
| Output $/M | $180 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 100.58 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Llama 13b?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Llama 13b better for coding?

GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Llama 13b share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.