# GPT-5.4 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 39× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-pro-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 39.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 58.5% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 12.2% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 18 | 94 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $30 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $180 | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | 54.1% |
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | 57.9% |
| CritPt | 30% | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | 21% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 149.97 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | 36.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 43.3 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2.7 Code costs 39× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.2 vs 42.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.