# GPT-5.4 Pro vs Grok 4.5

> GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 55.0 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.5 costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-pro-vs-grok-4-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4.5 in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 71.0 to 56.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 58.5% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 24.4% for Grok 4.5.
- Grok 4.5 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 500K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 55.0 |
| Rank | 16 | 22 |
| Context | 1.05M | 500K |
| Input $/M | $30 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $180 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89)
- Grok 4.5: 51.7 (#34)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | 46.4% |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1552 |
| SciCode | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,309 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#15)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 56.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 47.9% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 23.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 65.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1213 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,887 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10)
- Grok 4.5: 56.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | 52.6% |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | 70% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | 87.2% |
| CritPt | 30% | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | 36% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | 154.02 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 83.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.9% |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1462 |
| DTBench | — | 96.5% |
| LMCA | — | 45.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 74.4% |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17)
- Grok 4.5: 60.7 (#29)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | 24.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.8% |
| ProofBench | — | 31% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1457 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6)
- Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#21)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 93.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | 48.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1466 |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Grok 4.5: 37.8 (#63)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1287 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 27.3% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Grok 4.5: 54.5 (#43)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena French | — | 1458 |
| LMArena German | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1402 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1452 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Grok 4.5: 76.3 (#45)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1446 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 Pro: —
- Grok 4.5: 65.9 (#40)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1457 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Grok 4.5?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 55.0 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.5 costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

### Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Grok 4.5 better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.7 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Grok 4.5 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.