# GPT-5.4 nano vs Ring-2.6-1T

> GPT-5.4 nano has enough public results to be ranked (#125); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 nano scores higher in 1 category and Ring-2.6-1T in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 9.3% for GPT-5.4 nano and 3.7% for Ring-2.6-1T.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 125 | — |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 nano: 43.6 (#84)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 46.9% | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,005 | 432.57 |
| WeirdML | 49.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1405 | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 nano: 23.7 (#173)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.3% | 3.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 39.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 51.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1381 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 9% | — |
| DTBench | 80.3% | — |
| LMCA | 36.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.81 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.3 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 nano: 40.9 (#88)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 44.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 87.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1406 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 25.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 nano: 41.9 (#103)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 78.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 11.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1396 | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.4 nano: 36.7 (#78)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1196 | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 nano: 48.6 (#140)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena French | 1396 | — |
| LMArena German | 1367 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 nano: 71.9 (#144)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1362 | — |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#137)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 nano: 55.7 (#142)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1382 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 nano better than Ring-2.6-1T?

GPT-5.4 nano has enough public results to be ranked (#125); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is GPT-5.4 nano or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 nano and Ring-2.6-1T share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 nano has 40 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.