# GPT-5.4 mini vs Ring-2.6-1T

> GPT-5.4 mini has enough public results to be ranked (#69); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 30.3 to 25.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 49.9% for GPT-5.4 mini and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 44.8 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 69 | — |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 mini: 45.0 (#67)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 49.9% | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | 432.57 |
| FrontierCode | 27% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1438 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.4 mini: 29.6 (#74)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 36.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 mini: 30.3 (#77)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 10% | 3.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 61.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 61.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 11% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 40.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.83 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4 (#63)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 9.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 21% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1418 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 28.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 mini: 51.4 (#62)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 29.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1434 | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.4 mini: 39.0 (#51)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 mini: 52.1 (#94)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1446 | — |
| LMArena French | 1440 | — |
| LMArena German | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 mini: 74.3 (#99)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | — |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.4 mini: 42.9 (#107)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1407 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 mini: 64.2 (#56)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1370 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1665 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1429 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Ring-2.6-1T?

GPT-5.4 mini has enough public results to be ranked (#69); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is GPT-5.4 mini or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.0 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Ring-2.6-1T share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.
