# GPT-5.4 mini vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 30

## Summary

- They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 30.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 51.2% for GPT-5.4 mini and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $4.50 for GPT-5.4 mini.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 76 | 72 |
| Context | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.75 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $4.50 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 27% | 10.2% |
| SciCode | 49.9% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1438 | 1473 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 36.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 61.8% | 74.8% |
| CritPt | 10% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 11% | 17% |
| DTBench | 80% | 84% |
| LMCA | 40.8% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.84 | 147.37 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 61.7% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 9.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 28.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.9% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 29.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1446 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1440 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1409 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1374 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1368 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1417 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1405 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1407 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1412 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1370 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1429 | 1460 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1665 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 mini lists at $0.75 and $4.50.

### Is GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 400K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.