# GPT-5.3 Chat vs Wizardlm 13b

> GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-3-chat-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.3 to 30.7.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.3 Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 109 | 272 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | — |
| Output $/M | $14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | 1035 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1018 |

## Math

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1389 | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1433 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1398 | — |
| LMArena German | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1356 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1413 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Wizardlm 13b?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.