# GPT-5.3 Chat vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-3-chat-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 38.8.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 109 | 72 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $14 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.3 Chat: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1389 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.3 Chat: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1397 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1384 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1346 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1355 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1460 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.
