# GPT-5.3 Chat vs Qwen2.5-Max

> GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-3-chat-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.1 to 55.4.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 40.7 |
| Rank | 109 | 146 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | — |
| Output $/M | $14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1360 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.53 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1389 | 1369 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1397 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1384 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1346 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1355 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Qwen2.5-Max?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.4 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Qwen2.5-Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.