# GPT-5.3 Chat vs Qwen Plus

> GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 8.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-3-chat-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Plus in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 38.2 to 23.3.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 109 | 210 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $14 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1389 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1397 | — |
| LMArena German | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1355 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Qwen Plus?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 8.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen Plus better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Qwen Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.