# GPT-5.3 Chat vs MiniMax M1

> GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 5.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-3-chat-vs-minimax-m1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax M1 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.1 to 53.1.
- MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.55 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
- MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.3 Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 40.3 |
| Rank | 109 | 150 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | $0.55 |
| Output $/M | $14 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124)
- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | 1359 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102)
- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1339 |

## Math

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142)
- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1389 | 1361 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140)
- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1317 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124)
- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1397 | 1370 |
| LMArena German | 1384 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | 1346 | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129)
- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | 1312 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120)
- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68)
- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1355 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1335 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than MiniMax M1?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 5.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Chat or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.

### Is GPT-5.3 Chat or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.