# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Ring-2.6-1T

> GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.8 to 25.3.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 34 | — |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $21 | — |
| Output $/M | $168 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Ring-2.6-1T?

GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.