# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 1050× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 37.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 74% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 19.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 34 | 152 |
| Context | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $21 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $168 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | 43.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 144.62 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | 19.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 1050× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 400K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.