# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Flash costs 137× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 39.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 74% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 22.5% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 39 | 182 |
| Context | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $21 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $168 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | 143.26 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | 22.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | 0% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.6 Flash costs 137× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 400K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.