# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen Plus

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 96× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 22.0.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 34 | 204 |
| Context | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $21 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $168 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen Plus?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 96× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 400K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.