# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen-7B

> GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-qwen-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
- Qwen-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | — |
| Rank | 34 | — |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $21 | — |
| Output $/M | $168 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
- Qwen-7B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 106.47 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 45% |
| LAMBADA | — | 67.9% |
| PIQA | — | 77.9% |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
- Qwen-7B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 51.7% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen-7B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 76.4% |
| MMLU | — | 45% |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen-7B?

GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen-7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.