# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen-14B

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 28.7.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 34 | 273 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $21 | — |
| Output $/M | $168 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1072 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 112.8 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen-14B?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen-14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.