# GPT-5.2 Pro vs MiniMax-M2

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2 costs 110× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-minimax-m2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.8 to 18.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 79.3% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 14.8% for MiniMax-M2.
- MiniMax-M2 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 34 | 201 |
| Context | 400K | 205K |
| Input $/M | $21 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $168 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1370 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
- MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | 14.8% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1357 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
- MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1350 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1336 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1367 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1326 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1329 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1332 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1362 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than MiniMax-M2?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2 costs 110× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and MiniMax-M2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.