# GPT-5.2 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 110× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 79.3% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 24.7% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 39 | 196 |
| Context | 400K | 205K |
| Input $/M | $21 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $168 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | 24.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | 145.85 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1441 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1405 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1412 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than MiniMax-M2.7?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 110× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.