# GPT-5.2 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.1

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.1 costs 110× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.5 to 16.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 79.3% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 11.2% for MiniMax-M2.1.
- MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 39 | 178 |
| Context | 400K | 205K |
| Input $/M | $21 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $168 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1421 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | 11.2% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1411 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1397 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1431 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1430 |
| LMArena French | — | 1404 |
| LMArena German | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1397 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1400 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1396 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than MiniMax-M2.1?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.1 costs 110× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.