# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Llama 2-13B

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.8 to 12.3.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 34 | 304 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $21 | — |
| Output $/M | $168 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1062 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 105.8 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1051 |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1065 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1001 |
| LMArena French | — | 1043 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1086 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1046 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Llama 2-13B?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Llama 2-13B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.