# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Laguna M.1

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-laguna-m-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 20.3.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 34 | 252 |
| Context | 400K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $21 | — |
| Output $/M | $168 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1348 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
- Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
- Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Laguna M.1?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Laguna M.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.