# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Grok 4.3

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.3 costs 37× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-grok-4-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4.3 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 45.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 46% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 14.6% for Grok 4.3.
- Grok 4.3 is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- Grok 4.3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 34 | 80 |
| Context | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $21 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $168 | $2.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Grok 4.3: 41.3 (#117)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1357 |
| SciCode | — | 47.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 49.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1415 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 944.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Grok 4.3: 27.6 (#93)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 8% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1165 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 35.26 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)
- Grok 4.3: 34.9 (#60)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | 55.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 149.13 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1397 |
| DTBench | — | 90.7% |
| LMCA | — | 38.3% |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.3 |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)
- Grok 4.3: 45.8 (#60)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | 42.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | 14.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 11% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1388 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 33.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1385 |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#96)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1231 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 0% |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Grok 4.3: 50.7 (#114)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1423 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1402 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Grok 4.3: 72.3 (#135)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1366 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1393 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Grok 4.3: 58.6 (#112)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1380 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1406 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Grok 4.3?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.3 costs 37× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.3 does, with 1M tokens against 400K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Grok 4.3 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.