# GPT-5.2 Pro vs Granite 4.2 8B

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 537× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-granite-4-2-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.5 to 26.6.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 131K.
- Granite 4.2 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 40.5 |
| Rank | 39 | 148 |
| Context | 400K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $21 | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | $168 | $0.25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1380 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1329 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | — |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
- Granite 4.2 8B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1384 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1302 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1285 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1301 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Pro: —
- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1301 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Granite 4.2 8B?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 537× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Granite 4.2 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 8B has 11.