# GPT-5.2 Codex vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 88× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-codex-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.2 Codex.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 107 | 152 |
| Context | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $14 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.4 (#66)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 66.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,300 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.2 Codex: 40.7 (#20)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 66.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 88× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Codex or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 400K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.