# GPT-5.2 Codex vs Qwen3.6 27B

> GPT-5.2 Codex and Qwen3.6 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-codex-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.5 to 39.1.
- Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper at $0.60 / $3.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.2 Codex.
- GPT-5.2 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 42.2 |
| Rank | 111 | 117 |
| Context | 400K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $14 | $3.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 66.3% | — |
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,300 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 66.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Qwen3.6 27B?

GPT-5.2 Codex and Qwen3.6 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Codex or Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

### Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Qwen3.6 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.