# GPT-5.2 Codex vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-codex-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.5 to 37.7.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 111 | 191 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | — |
| Output $/M | $14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 66.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,300 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 66.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.