# GPT-5.2 Codex vs GPT-5 Mini

> GPT-5.2 Codex and GPT-5 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 41.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-codex-vs-gpt-5-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-5 Mini in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 41.0 to 31.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Terminal-Bench: 66.5% for GPT-5.2 Codex and 34.8% for GPT-5 Mini.
- GPT-5 Mini is cheaper at $0.25 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.2 Codex.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 41.8 |
| Rank | 111 | 128 |
| Context | 400K | 400K |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $14 | $2 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71)
- GPT-5 Mini: 40.1 (#146)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | 59.8% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 66.3% | 39.7% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,300 | 799.77 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 64.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1406 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.38 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22)
- GPT-5 Mini: 31.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 66.5% | 34.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 55.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -31.18 |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- GPT-5 Mini: 23.9 (#168)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 54.3% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 30% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 8.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1380 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 34.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.52 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |

## Math

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- GPT-5 Mini: 46.7 (#69)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 72.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1378 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 27.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 6.3% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- GPT-5 Mini: 45.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 75% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 19.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 83.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 13.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1379 |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- GPT-5 Mini: 35.6 (#85)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1202 |
| VPCT | — | 40.2% |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- GPT-5 Mini: 48.9 (#137)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1385 |
| LMArena French | — | 1386 |
| LMArena German | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1355 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- GPT-5 Mini: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 92.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1357 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- GPT-5 Mini: 41.9 (#132)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.2 Codex: —
- GPT-5 Mini: 55.2 (#148)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1325 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.1% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1313 |
| WildBench | — | 85.5% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1363 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than GPT-5 Mini?

GPT-5.2 Codex and GPT-5 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 41.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Codex or GPT-5 Mini?

GPT-5 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

### Is GPT-5.2 Codex or GPT-5 Mini better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 400K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and GPT-5 Mini share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Mini has 60.