# GPT-5.1-Codex vs Hunyuan Large Vision

> GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-hunyuan-large-vision
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 35.5 to 30.3.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 37.6 |
| Rank | 186 | 202 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1308 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,245 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 60.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 70.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1257 |

## Math

- GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235)
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1268 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1252 |

## Multimodal

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1243 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1251 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1280 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1254 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.