# GPT-5.1-Codex vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

> GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-granite-3-0-8b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.1-Codex leads 41.9 to 29.7.
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 31.6 |
| Rank | 186 | 270 |
| Context | 400K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116)
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1337 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 35.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,245 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33)
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 60.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 70.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1092 |

## Math

- GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235)
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1143 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1087 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1037 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1063 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1060 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1088 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1122 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5.1-Codex: —
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1096 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1071 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1063 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.