# GPT-4 Turbo vs o3-pro

> o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4 Turbo costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-4-turbo-vs-o3-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and o3-pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 38.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 18% for GPT-4 Turbo and 58.2% for o3-pro.
- GPT-4 Turbo is cheaper at $10 / $30 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
- o3-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 42.7 |
| Rank | 281 | 94 |
| Context | 128K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $10 | $20 |
| Output $/M | $30 | $80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-4 Turbo: 33.4 (#247)
- o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 18% | 58.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 86.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-4 Turbo: —
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 36.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-4 Turbo: 14.9 (#311)
- o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 61.6% | 86.9% |
| LMCA | 9.8% | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.25 | 147.43 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | 25.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.4 | — |

## Math

- GPT-4 Turbo: 8.6 (#316)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#263)
- o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 28.4% | 14.2% |
| GPQA Diamond | 46.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
| MMLU | 81.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-4 Turbo: 30.0 (#104)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1090 | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-4 Turbo: 40.7 (#211)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena French | 1275 | — |
| LMArena German | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1194 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1260 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-4 Turbo: 66.0 (#211)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1250 | — |

## Long Context

- GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#200)
- o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-4 Turbo: 47.9 (#201)
- o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1267 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-4 Turbo better than o3-pro?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4 Turbo costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or o3-pro?

GPT-4 Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $10 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

### Is GPT-4 Turbo or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

o3-pro does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and o3-pro share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.