# GPT-4.1 nano vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-4-1-nano-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 8.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 33.3% for GPT-4.1 nano and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
- GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 327 | 210 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | 1328 |
| Aider Polyglot | 8.9% | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 19% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 33% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 5.5% | 24% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.62 | — |

## Math

- GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 28.9% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | 70% | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | 1.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | 1328 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 55% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1270 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1198 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1323 |
| LMArena German | 1288 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | 1303 |
| IFEval | 84.3% | — |

## Long Context

- GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1283 | 1324 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1285 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1260 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 946 | — |
| WildBench | 81.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Qwen Plus?

GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is GPT-4.1 nano or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Qwen Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.