# GPT-4.1 mini vs o1-mini

> GPT-4.1 mini and o1-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.6 vs 34.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-4-1-mini-vs-o1-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 26

## Summary

- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 5 categories and o1-mini in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where o1-mini leads 35.4 to 24.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 3.5% for GPT-4.1 mini and 14% for o1-mini.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 34.0 |
| Rank | 240 | 235 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.60 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293)
- o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | 36.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1362 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55)
- o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
| Cybench | — | 10% |

## Reasoning

- GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340)
- o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | 0.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | 14% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | 1333 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | 135.82 |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |

## Math

- GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270)
- o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | 46.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1343 | 1358 |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | 1.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194)
- o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | 62.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1316 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82)
- o1-mini: —

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166)
- o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1358 | 1293 |
| LMArena German | 1351 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | 1303 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118)
- o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |

## Long Context

- GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275)
- o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1320 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199)
- o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-4.1 mini better than o1-mini?

GPT-4.1 mini and o1-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.6 vs 34.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is GPT-4.1 mini or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and o1-mini share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.