# GPT-4.1 mini vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-4-1-mini-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 43.3 to 31.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 40.4% for GPT-4.1 mini and 47% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for GPT-4.1 mini.
- GPT-4.1 mini accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 240 | 196 |
| Context | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $1.60 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40.4% | 47% |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1454 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | 145.85 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |

## Math

- GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1343 | 1420 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1444 |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82)
- MiniMax-M2.7: —

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1358 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1351 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | 1405 |
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |

## Long Context

- GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1419 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1412 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-4.1 mini better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 mini lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Is GPT-4.1 mini or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 mini does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.