# GLM-5V-Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5v-turbo-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 49.4.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 84 | 181 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Output $/M | $4 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1314 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1299 |

## Math

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1289 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.