# GLM-5V-Turbo vs Phi-4

> GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 22× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5v-turbo-vs-phi-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 40.5.
- Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- GLM-5V-Turbo accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 31.2 |
| Rank | 84 | 279 |
| Context | 200K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $1.20 | $0.07 |
| Output $/M | $4 | $0.14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
- Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1231 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 30.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-5V-Turbo: —
- Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
- Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1220 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.42 |
| LiveBench | — | 41.6% |

## Math

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
- Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1246 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 64.9% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
- Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1203 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
- Phi-4: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
- Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1212 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | 1224 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1222 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1209 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1158 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
- Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1201 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.4% |

## Long Context

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
- Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1217 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
- Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1206 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.6% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Phi-4?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 22× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Phi-4 better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5V-Turbo does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Phi-4 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.