# GLM-5V-Turbo vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5v-turbo-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 50.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 84 | 168 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Output $/M | $4 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1347 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1322 |

## Math

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1308 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.